Monday, April 19, 2021

TLP: - From Inception to Induction

 

Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan aka TLP was formed on 1 August 2015 by the late Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Since the inception in the political stream TLP has always championed the cause of Khatm-e-Nabuwat and Namoos-e -Risalat but all this through violence and it has always been a tradition of our religious parties that they resort to violence and ransacking of the public property and in the end they usually get clean chits from our old school courts. 

This article explores the evolution and political activism of the Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP), a religio-political group, from a protest movement to a political party, while retaining its character as a movement. Consequently, TLP has a hybrid structure where the lines between the movement and party are blurred. As a movement, TLP used protests and agitation for their political agenda, while utilizing the political structures to demand or block policies deemed detrimental to its religious interests. The emergence of TLP is a by-product of post-9/11 religio-political developments in Pakistan and the changing patterns of state patronage towards religious groups.

TLP represents the Barelvi sub-sect, the largest Muslim sub-sect in Pakistan. The party gets its inspiration from the execution of Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer. The governor was gunned down by one of his guards for being critical of the blasphemy law. In the eye of a considerable section of society, even a soft criticism of the blasphemy law is itself blasphemous and thus constitutes an unpardonable act.

The execution of Mumtaz Qadri and the promulgation of the Election Act, 2017 – which catapulted the TLP into popular politics took place when the PML-N, Barelvis’ first electoral choice, was in the saddle. The TTP’s rise was also aided by the changing political ethos under which politics has become largely a squalid affair in which demonizing rivals, showing zero tolerance for dissent, and the ability to command mindless submission from supporters have come to be prized as the foremost virtues of a leader. The TLP made adroit use of social media where the audience is remarkably impressionable and can be beguiled with myth-spinning without much ado.

The TLP was allotted crane as its election symbol in 2017. In its inaugural general elections in 2018, the TLP fielded 571 candidates including 178 for the National Assembly. Although it secured only two provincial assembly seats significantly enough, both in Karachi the party emerged as the fifth largest party nationwide with 2.2 million votes, accounting for 4.2 percent of the total votes cast, narrowly behind the relatively moderate alliance of MMA’s 2.56 million votes. In the Punjab province and the two biggest cities each, the TLP finished third in terms of votes obtained.

In order to explain the rise of the TLP, we need to briefly and broadly take stock of the circumstances that are crucial for a political parties’ birth and growth. Typically, these include political ideology, creed, ethnicity, location, caste or race and social class. In Pakistan, a multiethnic, multi-faith society, creed (religion or sect) and ethnicity have constituted far more significant cleavages than social class. This explains why society has not yet seen the rise of a workers’ party.

This has been at work in the case of the rise of the TLP as well. Barelvi political parties, such as the JUP, have contested national elections since 1970. The electoral appeal of these relatively moderate parties remained largely confined to urban Sindh, notably Karachi. Other sects or sub-sects have also had their political parties. Over the years, the electorate has not been much impressed with religious parties and overwhelmingly voted for the mainstream political parties. The rise of the MQM in the mid-1980s strengthened the ethnic cleavage in urban Sindh at the expense of religious parties. As a result, parties like the JUP were reduced to a rump. In other parts of the country, the Barelvi vote bank was mainly captured by the PML-N. Despite the presence of the Barelvi-Deobandi cleavage, an electorally viable political party could not be mobilized. The efforts of Allama Tahirul Qadri, a renowned Barelvi scholar who founded the Pakistani Awami Tehreek, to make a niche for himself in electoral politics also came to grief. Disillusioned with the electorate, he reposed his faith in agitation politics.

Unlike most mainstream parties, the TLP’s leadership is drawn from the lower middle and bottom of the economic heap. Rizvi himself was a man of humble origins. Those two factors placed him in an excellent position to garner support of the underprivileged sections of society. The combination of religion and economics that the TLP represents may turn out formidable if the people are convinced that their economic plight is underpinned by the prevalence of an ‘un-Islamic’ culture and system.
The violence of TLP finally met its last blow as the PTI government has issued a notification to ban the ultra-right-wing party under the anti-terrorism laws and has been inducted in the list of proscribed organizations. The interior ministry issued a notification declaring TLP as a proscribed organization on the pretext of threat to National security after the federal cabinet approved a summary to ban the party and Saad Hussain Rizvi has been placed in the fourth schedule under the anti-terrorism act 1997. The National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) has recommended the government to take over madrassas operated by the TLP and crack down on its sources of funding.

Many political pundits and defense analysts fear that although government has banned TLP but it can regroup and organize again under a new name as this has been a traditional practice in Pakistan as we have the examples of Sipah-e-Sahaba and Jama’at-ud-Da'wah which are now working under the names of  Millat-e-Islamia and Lashkar-e-Tayyaba respectively and lastly the rise of right-wing politics is a matter of grave concern, because mixing religion and politics is a dangerous game for a multi-creed territory like Pakistan.

 

 

Saturday, April 3, 2021

Fate of Wasim Akram Plus

                                            


v  The fate of the Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar (Wasim Akram plus ) as referred by the respectable PM Imran khan  has become a permanent feature of the country’s political discourse. A similar round of speculations about his status erupted in the wake of the Senate elections. However, so far there is no clear indication that he is on his way out.

      Causes

·       The larger problem is the poor record of governance in Punjab. Whether it is the failure of the waste management system.

·         The frequent change in the bureaucracy has also tarnished the image of the civil services of Pakistan.

·         The last and most important is the weak political management which has led to disgruntlement among the ruling coalition parliamentarians from the province and many times it has been echoed in the cabinet meetings.

·         The musical chair situation Of the IGs have also added fuel to the fire.

·         Failure of bringing the much promised and awaited reforms

·         NA -75 Daska election controversy was also another episode of embarrassment and sign of incompetence for Punjab Government.

 

   Governments and Opposition response: -

In the last two years, there has been a visible attempt by the PTI’s federal leadership to run Punjab’s affairs from Islamabad. The results have not been encouraging. Yet, Prime Minister Imran Khan continues to reiterate that Mr Buzdar is the most suitable person for the job.

This despite the fact that people in his own party and allies have been advising him to rethink his decision to keep him on as chief minister. This is linked to an increasing tempo of pulls and pushes by aspirants from within the ruling coalition to elbow their way into the province’s top office. Within the PTI, there is a long list of aspirants who have been lobbying to replace Mr Buzdar. From among the allies, PML-Q leader and Speaker of the Punjab Assembly Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi is seen as the strongest candidate. However, the PTI leadership is said to be reluctant to hand over the reins of the province to an allied party. The PPP is also eyeing an in-house change in the Punjab Assembly by roping in the PML-Q and having the PML-N lend its support. For now, there is little headway on this front.

      Consequences: -

If the performance of the present chief minister is an indication of how things will be managed ahead, it is hard to see the kind of betterment happening in Punjab as claimed by the ruling party. This means with each passing day the poor governance will start to weigh heavy on the PTI’s re-election prospects in the province. This can have dangerous consequences because Punjab remains a stronghold of the PML-N and mismanagement in political and administrative areas will help the PML-N build its own stock for the next elections and if this continues until 2023, so no wise man can think of PTIs return to control Punjab in 2023. Political Pundits even fear that after this type of performance many of the PTI MPAs may not win next time even from their own constituencies as many people still want the PML(N) to rule Punjab and frankly speaking PML(N) was far better than PTI In the Land of five rivers as they have upgraded and modernized Punjab with many schemes and development projects 

The prime minister will need to take some action in order to halt the slide. However, the complexity of the situation will make such a change very difficult. Punjab is turning out to be the biggest challenge for the PTI government at a time when it needs to show performance in all areas. Till such a change happens and there are visible signs of improvement in the province, the fate of Usman Buzdar will keep featuring prominently in our national discourse.

Sunday, January 3, 2021

The lost legacy of Congress in UP

 Uttar Pradesh (UP) literally means northern state and population wise is the largest state in India and area wise it is the fourth largest state after Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. UP accounts for 8-10 percent of India’s GDP. If UP become an independent country, it will be one of the largest democracies in the world after, the USA and Indonesia. With around 220 million people, UP is smaller than Indonesia that boasts over 250 million people but looking at the faltering democratic traditions in Indonesia, UP stands out as much as a better democracy.

If we deeply look into the political history of UP, we find that after independence in 1947, for 2 decades, the Indian National Congress (INC) ruled on its own. The longest serving CM was Govind Ballabh pant who remained CM from 1946 to 1954.Then another INC politician Sampurnanand , who occupied the post for 6 years until 1960;followed by Chandra Bhanu Gupta and Sucheta Kriplani for3 years each.

Finally, in 1967 a former leader of the INC, Charan singh deprived the congress of its hold in UP to become the first non–congress CM of UP, Charan Singh became a bitter critic of both JL Nehru and his daughter Indira Gandhi, but could maintain his rule in UP for 2 years only, from 1970 to 1977 Congress somehow managed to regain and retain power in UP but in 1977 Janata Party formed its government in UP but lost to again to congress just after 3 years in 1980.

From 1980 to 1989 for almost a decade the Congress Party once again regained the power, following which the Mulayam Singh Yadav (MSY) took hold of UP for the first time which lasted only for 18 months. Then the BJP’s Kalyan Singh was elected the CM who was dismissed when he failed to restrain the Singh Parivar (the RSS and its coteries) from destroying the Babri Mosque in December 1992, then MSY remained in power for another 18 months, followed by BSP’s Mayawati just for 4 months.

For the next 10 years BJP and BSP alternatively held power to be succeeded by Mulayam Singh once again in 2003, this time he remained the CM for 4 years till 2007.in 2012 MSY again formed the government but selected his son Akhilesh to be the CM who remained the master of UP until 2017. In 2017 elections BJP won the UP elections and formed the government and Yogi Adityanath was made CM.In UP the congress had not been able to form the government since 1989 and if we look into the political arena of the UP for last 31 years ,slightly better is the BJP who had formed the government two times. Another important player has been the BSP formed by Kanshi Ram but later led by Mayawati. The BSP claimed to represent the lower casts and tribes.In addition the BSP has also attracted the votes from religious minorities.After the death of Kanshi ram Mayawati became the supreme leader of BSP and until now has been the CM for four tenures. The INC has been losing the game consecutively despite Rahul’s Gandhi efforts to revive the party in UP. Now we all can do is just wait for the next UP elections.

The million-dollar question is, Will the INC regain its legacy or not????



Friday, November 13, 2020

   The only thing in which Pakistan is making development.

We have seen a series of rape cases for the last 73 years and in every case we just write some lines on our social accounts and the government also just pays attention to only some cases and this attention is also because of the social media and due to the protests of our so called “ghairati awaam” and then our all hue and cry finishes after 2 or 3 days and we again make ourselves busy in our daily and purposeless routine. Following are some cases in which we made noise and government acted upon it.

1.      The motorway case (9 September 2020).

2.       Islamabad’s Farishta case (15 May 2019).

3.       Mardan’s Asma case (14 January 2018).

4.       Kasur’s Zainab case (4 January 2018).

Since 2015, 22000 rape cases have been reported but only 77 culprits have been put behind the bars and just 4060 cases have been filed and just 731 cases have gone through the court proceedings and still 3329 cases are pending and this gives us the statistics that only 18 percent of the total reported cases have gone through the Judge’s eyes. The human rights authorities have expressed their concern that the total number of cases are up to 60000 and this huge number of undisclosed cases is because the victims and their families are being given threats by the culprits and even many times the police officials pressurizes the families not to pursue the case as it can bring a bad name to their family and tribe. Majority of the unreported cases are believed to be from Interior Sindh and Punjab where the wadera and chaudry system is so powerful that these types of cases usually blows like a wind and the victims and have no choice but to stay quiet and shed tears on their fates. The million-dollar question here is that why The mullahs and Sufis who portray themselves as the guardians of Islam are silent and just hide in their house when these cases are reported.

Is our government that incompetent and packed with the corrupt?  Can it really save our women from these monsters? It is the big question mark on the government’s performance whether they are serious or not, to tackle these issue and can they control this pathetic situation with such ill and myopic approach, where the daily rape average is 11. Now the ball lies in the courts of authorities.

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

                 The new Mullah in Command.


v In a dramatic move the Afghan Taliban replaced the head of their negotiation team and has appointed Sheikh Abdul Hakeem (a close aid of the supreme leader). Sheikh Haibatullah Akhunzada for the long awaited peace talks with the Afghan government. Sheikh Hakeem landed in Doha a few days ago and replaced an articulate Taliban leader Sher Muhammad Abbas Stankzai. Also the supreme leader has changed Sohail Shaheen (spokesman) of Afghan Taliban Qatar based political Head Quarter with Naeem Wardak.

·        It was only a week ago when Taliban had formally announced the team for Intra Afghan dialogue. Taliban sources have also told a newspaper correspondent that the supreme leader had personally chosen the members of the negotiation team and has given them a free hand to discuss the issues and can even declare ceasefire if they felt it necessary for the success of the peace talks.

§  Now let's discuss a brief profile of Sheikh Abdul Hakeem. He is a hardliner leader and had served as a shadow chief justice during the Taliban regime. He had also served as the head of “Ulema Shura”. He is stated to be very close to the supreme leader Sheikh Haibatullah Akhunzada. According to some sources, Sheikh Akhunzada respects Sheikh Hakeem alot and all the decisions made by Hakeem were always backed by Akhunzada. It is also reported that Sheikh Hakeem is one of the few Taliban leaders whom Akhunzada pays extra regards and even “kisses his hands” as a sign of respect.

Ø I think now we should also discuss the other members of the negotiating team as they all will be the critical thinkers and their skills and decisions will be crucial for bringing stability to the war torn country.

                 Name.

       Ancestral home town
             (province).

 Portfolios during Taliban Reign.

Sher Muhammad Abbas Stanakzai

           Logar.

 Retired Afghan army colonel.
  Deputy  Foreign  Minister

Maulvi Shahabuddin Dilawar

           Logar.

     Judge Of court of Cassation.

Mullah Shireen Akhund.

           Kandahar.

     Deputy to mullah umar

Mullah Lateef Mansur

           Paktia.

      Minister of Agriculture.

Mullah Sohail Shaheen.

           Paktia.

Former private secretary to Mullah Omar

Mullah Khairullah Khairkhwa

           Kandahar.

Interior Minister and governor Of Herat.

Muhammad Anas Haqqani

           Paktia. 

Anas Haqqani, the younger brother of Sirajuddin Haqqani, a fierce mujahhid

 

Maulvi Ameer khan muttaqi

           Helmand

Minister of Information and culture.

Sheikh Muhaamad qasim

           Kunduz

Minister of justice.

Mullah Abdul salam hanafi

           Jowzan

Deputy Education Minister and Taliban commander in Jowzan

Maulvi Matiullhaq Khalis

           Nangarhar

           

Taliban commander in Nangarhar

Mullah Muhammad Nabi Omari

           Khost

Minister of Communication

Mullah Abdulhaq wasiq

           Ghazni

Deputy Minister of Intelligence

Mullah Noorullah

           Zabul

Governor of Balkh

Maulvi Farid Uddin

           Paktika

Governor of paktika

 

Maulvi Abdul Kabir

          Herat

Governor of Nangarhar  Province and Head of the Eastern Zone.

Maulvi Abdul Ghani Biradar

        Badakhshan

Governor of Herat  and Nimruz provinces and/Commander for western Afghanistan.

Qari Din Muhamad

Badakhshan

Minister of Planning and  member of Taliban council  responsible for Takhar and Badakhshan

Mullah fazil Mazloom

Uruzgan

Incharge of the strategic Kunduz region

 

v One of the main and interesting thing about the negotiating team is that 65 percent members are chosen from the Taliban’s powerful decision making body “Rehbari Shura “. A senior Taliban leader has stated that they can join the intra Afghan dialogue any time but he also added that the supreme leader has reservations about the team announced by the Afghan government. The main question arises here is that why Akhunzada (supreme leader) changed the chief of peace talks committee?  The answer is very simple as sheikh Hakeem unlike the former head has a fierce personality and is a hard liner leader who has the capability to turn the things in his favor if anything goes against them, moreover his appointment can also be seen by another lens, that sheikh Hakeem is very close to Mullah Haibatullah Akhunzada and by doing this the supreme leader has represented himself in the negotiating team as Akhunzada is very strict in regard of facing camera and it is reported that Akhunzada has faced camera only 3 or 4 times in his entire life.

v In the end, we all should hope for the best and the neighboring countries should also play their role in making the peace talks successful so that peace should be established in Afghanistan which has seen nothing but fighting and destruction for the last 40 years

 

 

Sunday, August 9, 2020

 

 The Change in command.

v Background: -

It has been a year since the dilution of Article 370 and Kashmir has been made a union territory and the Modi Government has made a new move by changing the LG (Lieutenant governor) of Kashmir, but The people are thinking that what is new because only the man has been changed and still all the things will be controlled by the home ministry in Delhi as it is always done, but there is a big difference and the difference is that this new LG is a Politician. Kashmir has a peculiar history and since 1947 it is only for 14 months as yet that Kashmir has had a full time politician as Governor and that was as recently as in 2018 and 2019 that was Satyapal malik who was governor for only 14 months and then as status changed to LG for few months but he then came back to India and now he serving as the CM of Goa since October 2019 and then GC Murmu (a civil servant) was made LG who has now resigned exactly one year after abolition of Article 370. If we go back to history of Kashmir since 1947 it is quite amazing that how a politician has not been given the charge of Kashmir whether there had been an elected Government in Kashmir or not. The million-dollar question here is that why Kashmir has not been handled well since 1947? It is because no Indian central leader has been chosen to handle it and always the agencies and bureaucracy had been involved in controlling it. This all is because Kashmir has never been treated in political way. India has always seen Kashmir as military issue, intelligence issue, India -Pakistan issue or Territorial issue and politicians whether people like or not but they are flexible which is opposite in case of military or bureaucracy as the have moral integrity and they are trained like this.

v The new LG: -

Manoj Sinha was born in 1959 in Ghazipur, UP. He is an M.Tech in civil engineering  from the institute of Technology ,BHU . In 1982 while was just 23 Sinha stepped into politics by becoming the president of the student’s union at BHU.In 1996 he made his big political leap by joining BJP and winning his first LOK Sabha poll from his Ghazipur constituency.The “ vikas Purush” of Ghazipur repeated his win in 1999 and won the seat third time in 2014. He served as Minister of state for Railways and Minister of state for communication during the Modi Government. After the BJP won UP Elections in 2017 Sinha was seen as the Modi’s pick for CM but je Lost to RSS choice Yogi Adityanath. He lost the 2019 Lok sabha seat to BSP’S Afzal Ansari. Now the interesting thing here is that Sinha is very close to Modi and has great ties with him and it it seems that this post of LG has been given to Sinha as compensatory post due to his defeat at CM elections and 2019 elections defeat. With Sinha’s appointment it would mean a political touch and a closer watch ON J&K by PM Modi and many believe that Sinha might stir the political wind in J&K after a troubled year post the dilution of article 370. Will Manoj Sinha prove to be political Game changer in the tumultuous Valley????

 



Friday, July 10, 2020

The Real Tabdeeli.


The frequent changes in the key bureaucratic positions particularly in the center and in Punjab is hurting the governance. It is a “musical chair” like situation for the bureaucracy as the Punjab government do frequent changes on key positions that has made the concept of performance and accountability totally redundant. Let’s have a look on the changes which the Punjab and federal government has made since coming into after July 2018 election.

  •   The health sector after the Covid- 19 pandemic has become all important, Dr Allah baksh was removed in march when the corona had just struck. He was replaced by Dr  syed Tauqir shah (PAS) officer who had served as PS to ex CM Shehbaz Sharif during the PMLN tenure and he successfully managed the epidemic in Punjab in 2011,but however he was removed just after one week. Dr Tanveer who was replaced by Tauqir shah was also changed after some months and Amir Ashraf khwaja has been posted the health secretary last month.
  •  Chief secretary Punjab Azam suleman who was posted last year amid the pronouncements of depoliticizing the administration was changed after 4 months. The officers who were sidelined by Azam suleman has again staged a comeback once Azam was removed.Former commissioner DG Khan Tahir Khurshid, ex secretary to CM Dr shoaib and SSp Amir taimoor Uzdar (uncle of Cm Usman Buzdar) were removed by Azam suleman but now all have come back with full force.

  • The most hilarious and blatant example of this bureaucratic musical chair is the position of Punjab secretary in HEC.  9 secretaries has been changes since September 2018.
  •  The irrigation department is perhaps the worst hit as it has seen 11 secretaries since the arrival of Usman Buzdar
  •  Rawalpindi division which is the most sensitive one has seen 4 commissioners since PTI came      into power.
  •       The food secretaries of Punjab has been changed five times and this was also the reason behind      the wheat crisis.
  •        The federal government has so far changed 5 IG police and four chief secretaries.
  •      The board of investment also saw four chairmans Since the PTI government came into power.
  •        The last but not the least in DG Khan which is also the home town of Punjab CM Usman          Buzdar has got six commissioners and five deputy commissioners so far.

v  The civil administration and the police postings in the province has become a joke.

The situation on one hand is hurting the governance and on other it has seriously demoralized the civilian bureaucracy and no one is sur about his tenure. PTI in its manifesto had promised the civil service reforms and respect for the bureaucrats but the bureaucrats have become a rolling stone like never before.